Municipalities told to do more about deer before asking province for help
Municipalities
must take the bull by the horns — or the buck by the antlers —
before they can ask for provincial help in solving their deer
problems, says a Capital Regional District report going to
directors next week.
Bylaws
prohibiting deer feeding and allowing higher fences, combined with
public education about repellents and landscaping options, should
be in place before either municipalities or the CRD goes to the
province asking for changes to hunting regulations or a trap and
kill program, the report says.
“In the
case of population control measures, provincial approval is
required, but conflict reduction measures need to be in place
prior to qualifying for such approval,” it says, adding,
“Conflict reduction measures are largely within the jurisdiction
of local governments.”
The report
takes the multitude of recommendations from the Citizens Advisory
Committee — a group formed this year to address concerns about
the growing number of urban deer — and distills them into lists
of what is possible at the local level and what needs provincial
approval.
“We
needed to determine what was feasible and not feasible. How does
it hit the ground,” said Bob Lapham, CRD general manager of
planning.
Some of
the more controversial proposals — such as professional
sharpshooting and reducing distance regulations for firearms and
bows — have been effectively scrapped. The report says those
measures are considered socially unacceptable and unfeasible
because of safety risks.
The CRD
does not like the idea of being given authority to deal with
aggressive deer, which is seen by municipalities as a form of
provincial downloading.
“Delegation
of such authority would come with added insurance, liability,
firearms, staff training and other issues that municipalities are
unlikely to willingly assume,” the report says.
Capturing
and relocating deer has been dismissed because deer do not travel
well and deer contraception is not available in Canada at this
time, said Marg Misek-Evans, regional planning manager at the CRD.
However,
some municipalities may choose to go it alone and ask the province
for action on hunting regulation changes or culling with a clover
trap and bolt gun.
“For
people that worry this is an endless loop, options are available
to municipalities right away,” Lapham said.
The
question is whether municipalities want to act individually or
regionally, he said.
“There
are a lot of steps that can be taken in more rural areas. In urban
areas, it is more challenging,” he said.
The report
will go the CRD’s planning, transportation and protective
services committee on Nov. 28 at 1:30 p.m. Members of the public
will be able to speak at that meeting.
The
recommendation is for CRD staff to make presentations to councils
before the report returns to the committee with municipal
feedback. The committee will then make recommendations to the CRD
board.
In Oak
Bay, where there has been increasing concern over garden munching
and aggressive animals, Mayor Nils Jensen said he hoped leadership
and action would come from the CRD.
“The
problem with a patchwork of solutions is deer do not recognize
municipal boundaries,” he said.
The
problem could be addressed by subregions as issues on Saanich
Peninsula are different from the core, Jensen said.
“But we
are certainly determined to take some action.”
these two articles lavoie's and kidd's are fascinating. they give a new meaning to passing the buck (or is it doe?) it is remarkable that when proven non-lethal solutions exist, these pollyticians run around parroting "you do it" to each other. this is what well-meaning taxpayers paid for?!!
ReplyDeletego non-lethal! the deer 'problem' is solved and those against abuse and cruelty won't worry you clowncillors. it's a win-win all the way!
I think these politicians are busy trying to make the best of it, instead of doing the best they can for the society they have sworn to serve. And they are doing it all while being paid by taxpayers!
ReplyDelete