The CRD Board has decided to lead the
region in some deer management solutions. These will include
regional bylaw models on feeding deer, speed limits where deer
collisions are most likely, and providing information on
deer-resistant plantings. Board Chairman Young even suggests that
the CRD could discuss immuno-contraception with the federal
government.
But no one would touch the topic of
culling in the CRD at the November 28 Planning, Transportation and
Protective Services meeting. No one but the gardeners who spoke,
that is. Landscape designer Lynn Morton stated, “Get rid of them.
All of them. The sooner the better.”
The CRD Board will not be recommending
lethal action against the deer – that chore will still fall to the
municipalities, who will claim to be acting on the needs of their
residents/taxpayers.
Sharp shooting and bowhunting in
residential areas is off the table, but clover trap/bolt gun killing
is favoured in the Citizen's Advisory Group's recommendations as a
method to destroy inconvenient deer that avoids the use of missiles.
That is why DeerSafe Victoria sent a
survey to 13 mayors and councilors. The communities with the highest
number of complaints are the ones that are going to be pressured into
lethal action. The CRD Board will not be footing the bill for culls
in the region, but the municipalities will.
The municipalities
erroneously believe that the CRD Board will be taking the lead in
deer management across the region. The lethal solution will fall
squarely on their shoulders. The public on both sides of the debate
wants to know how knowledgable their mayors and councilors are about
an issue that is likely to escalate in the coming months.
The survey as it
currently stands:
If I am reading the results correctly, it shows that 82 (!) councillors haven't even bothered to respond. And these are the people who have now been tasked with deciding the fate of the deer? Does this disturb anyone else?
ReplyDelete