The recent
suspension of Conservation Officer Bryce Casavant for refusing to
kill two 8-week old bear cubs, despite orders from his supervisor and
the provincial veterinarian, has revealed to British Columbians the
extent of this government's policy to destroy our wildlife based
solely upon complaints from the public. On the strength of a
citizen's phone call the provincial veterinarian in Victoria ordered
the destruction of a nursing sow and her cubs near Port Hardy,
ignoring the professional opinion of the CO.
In the fall of 2013
the story of a friendly buck named John Deer turned to tragedy when the province ordered him “humanely euthanized” near
Vernon, B.C. “Provincial wildlife veterinarian Helen Schwantje
says the docile deer was believed to be the same one that tangled its
antlers in a child’s backpack...” National Post, Tristin Hopper,
September 12, 2013.
In the same article
Liz White of Animal Alliance of Canada “criticized wildlife
authorities for being too quick to turn rifles on questionable deer,
particularly when it could have been enough to simply “haze” the
deer out of town.” Hazing is the use of trained border collies to gently pressure ungulates out of areas where they are not welcome, a useful strategy for interior towns that are surrounded by forest. To date only one pilot project for hazing was conducted in Kimberley, BC when the province permitted a one day trial.
All that is needed
to order the destruction of nuisance wildlife is the belief
that they have crossed an imaginary line of urban etiquette –
referred to in ministry language as “public safety.”
When the public
expresses outrage at the killing of our wildlife, be it by systematic
culls or by the destruction of individual animals, those opinions are
brushed aside as sentimentality. Annoyance and fear are the only
emotions that the province will respond to – with lethal results.
Advertisements on
the MFLNRO website's document Hunting and Trapping Regulations Synopsis
are a shocking eye-opener into the business of animal slaughter and
the attitudes of this government towards our resources –
affectionately known to the public as "our wildlife."
The ministries
responsible for our wildlife have an agenda, and it's not
stewardship.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.